Abbreviated Qualitative Research Plan Essay

IntroductionLaws governing the administration of agnate processes, vary from resign to state within the United States. The U.S. speak to system al humbleds states to enforce paternal sanctions even after they have been definitively determined that a world is non the biologic father of the child. (Brott. 2008) Currently, these irregularities regarding composition create egregious injustices such as, men who, through DNA examen, have been proven not to be the biological father of the child, still macrocosm force to pay child congest even to the extent of being at risk of imprisonment should the saddle fail to maintain monetary victuals. Be make tabu of the monetary component of writing cases, low income men argon at a greater risk of ensure catastrophic life-circumstances as a result of writing imposter. Because of the inconsistency of the vary laws governing paternal remain firm in each state, low-income families with already hardly resources are faced with insta nces of caring and providing for a child (believing them to be a blood relative) only to find out later that the child was not related.See more Social process essayThe disparities in the U.S. dally system regarding paternity of low-income individuals has extreme effects on whether children would ever make love their fathers, but they also lead to men being involuntarily held financially or legally responsible for children they did not biologically father a burden that has disproportionate negative effects on a domain with low-income. Dr. Vincent Miller contends Nearly 30% of the tested paternity cases in our exam ground result in an exclusion of the alleged father presented as the biological father. (2010). The mere allegation of a mans paternity,results in the U.S. court system entering financially, as vigorous as criminally stick to judgments. Once caught up in the system, a wrongly accused man faces a systemic dismantling of his freedom, creditability, and emotional stabil ity. Frank Hatley was recently released from fall back after serving time for owing back child support for a child that was later proven by DNA testing not to be his. (8/11/09). http//www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/11/georgia.child.support/index.html. Currently, there are no studies that assess the recovery process of a victim of paternity fraud. After a year in jail, what becomes of a mans employment, family, finances, or mentality? Purpose StatementThis is a qualitative test that go away examine the avenues for relief after experiencing the impact of paternity (Creswell. 2009). research QuestionsIs the U.S. Court system equipped to make whole a victim of paternity fraud? What are the positive and negative effects of true inconsistent state laws as experienced by the victims of paternity fraud? How do current laws influence the intent to commit fraud?How do current laws encourage the state to abet paternity fraud sort of than correcting the results of paternity fraud? How do cur rent laws contribute to a tillage of unfairness with regard to non-custodial paternal-sanctions? Would standardization of DNA Paternity testing balk unfair penalties? Would standardization of DNA Paternity testing improve medical checkup history reliability? Could definitive DNA test results provide the backside for legal relief to a man held responsible for a fathering a child in error? What steps must a victim take to seek recovery through the courts What are the costs tortuous in contesting an incorrect paternity decision? Are there whatsoever incentives for the mother to seek correction?Are there any penalties levied on the false accuser?Literature ReviewAnnotated BibliographyBrott, A. (2008, Jul 27). Paternity fraud common. Sun Journal. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/378934753?accountid=14872 baby bird support, money, emotions, and victims of paternity fraud rising survey. (2009, Sep 23).PR Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/447 485536?accountid=14872 CHRI, S. Q. (2001, May 16). As DNA tests rule out paternity, men sue to stop support payments. The Atlanta Constitution. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/413895636?accountid=14872 Courts ignore paternity fraud. (2007, Dec 12). The Berkshire Eagle. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/379923439?accountid=14872 Father takes DNA paternity fraud case to U.S. supreme court. (2002, May 31). U.S.Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/450942550?accountid=14872 Leeds, T. L. (2005). Paternity fraud, the poor someones adoption and the interests of the child. American Journal of Family Law, 19(1), 20-24. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/275150869?accountid=14872 Mandatory DNA testing would nurse against paternity fraud. (2001, Feb 28). Washington Times. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/409646680?accountid=14872 Research PlanThe participants of this study allow for be selected from low-incom e men actively contesting paternity in U.S. courts as well as custodial parents in order to gain the negative outline of the phenomenon. (Lincoln & Guba. 1985) The natural setting result be litigants within the State Courts system involved with matter of Paternity. (Lincoln & Guba. 1985) This setting will be relevant to the phenomenon being studied. (Smeaton. 2008) Information will be collected through focus group interviews and surveys. Participants will be engaged via open ended questions regarding their experience. (Sarkar. 2014) The instruments used to respect outcomes will be the researcher who will inquire of the respondents. Researcher will ensure to guard against personal bias. (Sarkar. 2014) Research will consist of protracted engagement to glean additional insight into whether participants in a paternity contest can again regain equilibrium within their lives. (Lincoln & Guba. 1985) Threats to hardship will be selection, candor (existence of undisclosed extenuating c ircumstances), instability of respondents cause difficulty in locating them at regular reporting intervals. The results will allow recommendations to be made to improve the paternity process, based on analysis of the data collected.ReferencesBiotechnology DNA technology roots out paternity fraud. (2010). Life Science Weekly, , 287. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/746790449?accountid=14872 Child support, money, emotions, and victims of paternity fraud New survey. (2009, Sep 23). PR Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/447485536?accountid=14872 Courts ignore paternity fraud. (2007, Dec 12). The Berkshire Eagle. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/379923439?accountid=14872 Creswell, J. (2009). Research shape Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Laureate Education, Inc., custom Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2008). three-figure methods, an example. Baltimo re AuthorLincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks CA. Sage. Mandatory DNA testing would protect against paternity fraud. (2001, Feb 28). Washington Times.Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/409646680?accountid=14872 Sreeroopa, S. (2014). Qualitative research methods. Media Retrieved from Laureate Education, Inc.